Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, providing lots of additional features and performance optimizations. Galaxy S10 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but both of them are equally thin.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A70's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the Galaxy S10 one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy A70 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.