Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 overall score. The Galaxy S10 design is somewhat thinner and way lighter than Samsung Galaxy F62, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should count with all the same OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.