Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, getting a global score of 88.3 against 78.9. The Galaxy S10 design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy M20, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S10 features just a little better performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a superior battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 features a superior camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture, a bigger camera sensor and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.