Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is a bit better than Galaxy M30, getting an 88.3 score against 82.4. Although Galaxy S10 and the Galaxy M30 were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy S10 is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S10 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution, a much larger aperture and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures. Galaxy M30 has as much memory to install games and applications as Samsung Galaxy S10, they have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal storage.
The Galaxy M30 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.