Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 general score. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 design is notably newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note3.
Galaxy S10 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a much better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a greater display pixels density and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy S10 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy S10 has much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.