Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Galaxy S10's construction is extremely newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a bit better display density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy S10 takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 also has faster video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture for better photography in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a little more money than Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.