Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting an 88.3 score against 78.1. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Even though the Galaxy S10 is incredibly older than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's design is a bit lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy S10 has a sharper display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger display, a much better pixels amount per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Samsung Galaxy S10 features slightly more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.