Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 551 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 88.3 score against 80.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 design is incredibly thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released about 13 months before.
Galaxy S10 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy S10 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a 0.39 inches sensor and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S10 also has a way better video definition.
Galaxy S10 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.