Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-09-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10, having an 88.9 score against 88.3. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a much thicker and a lot heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S10. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S10 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3040, it also counts with a better screen density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also counts with a much larger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.