Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 score. Even though Galaxy S10 is older than the Xiaomi Poco M3, it's design is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, providing you some additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S10 counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. Galaxy S10 features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 76% bigger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy S10 costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Poco M3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.