Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a global score of 88.3 against 81.6. The Galaxy S10 design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it was released about 18 months before. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features.
Galaxy S10 has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Galaxy S10 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low light environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.