Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than iPhone 11 Pro Max, with an 86.3 score against 85.3. The Galaxy S10e is a a little bit thinner and extremely lighter device than the iPhone 11 Pro Max, even though both were released with only a couple months difference. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a little bit better pixels amount per inch of display, a little higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has 2 less and slower processing cores and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy S10e, and although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a smaller aperture, they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same back camera sensor size, the same video definition and a 12 mega pixels back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.