Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.29 ounces | -- |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 76.7 global score. The Galaxy S10e counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a really smaller display. Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S10e features a lot better processing power than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Galaxy S10e features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.