Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a just a little heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy S10e and the Google Pixel 3 feature very similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 3 has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10e features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S10e features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3100mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a less megapixels camera and a lower video resolution, and they both have a same size sensor, the Galaxy S10e also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.