Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting an 86.3 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's somewhat lighter. The Galaxy S10e features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen, a quite larger display and a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S10e captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy S10e also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy S10e features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S10e, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.