Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. Although Galaxy S10e and Google Pixel 3a XL were released only 2 months apart, Galaxy S10e is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. Galaxy S10e has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2280px resolution. Galaxy S10e counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S10e takes clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera and a worse video definition, and they both have the same sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.