Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a just a bit lighter and just a little thinner phone than the Google Pixel 4, even though they were only released with a couple months difference. Google Pixel 4's processor is very similar to the processor in Galaxy S10e, both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2280px, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S10e features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP resolution and a worse video definition, and they both have the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy S10e also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S10e has a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy S10e costs more money than Google Pixel 4, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.