Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. The Galaxy S10e construction is a little thinner and lighter than the Google Pixel 4 XL, even when both were released with only a few months difference. The Galaxy S10e and the Google Pixel 4 XL count with quite similar CPUs, both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a larger aperture.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 19% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.