Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S10e, having an 89 score against 86.3. Google Pixel 5's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S10e, but it is a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 5, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. The Google Pixel 5 and Samsung Galaxy S10e both feature really similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and a 0.39 inches sensor, it also counts with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 32% greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S10e. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S10e, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.