Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.29 ounces | -- |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a overall score of 86.3 against 82.2. Galaxy S10e counts with a much faster processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.