Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the HTC One M9, with a overall score of 86.3 against 77.7. Galaxy S10e is a a lot newer device, and it is also just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9. HTC One M9 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits processor.
The HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots just a bit better videos and photos than HTC One M9, because although it has a tinier sensor, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture. Galaxy S10e features a bit longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 9 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S10e, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC One M9, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.