Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. The Galaxy S10e is a somewhat lighter cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but both of them are equally thin. Galaxy S10e has a bit superior processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The HTC U Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. HTC U Ultra has just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10e features just a bit better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality images, and they both have a same resolution back camera and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a bigger camera aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy S10e is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.