Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-03-31 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than LG G5, getting an 86.3 score against 76.1. Even though Galaxy S10e is a little bit thicker than LG G5, it's a little bit lighter and much newer. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better processing unit than LG G5, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The LG G5 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a better memory to install applications and games than LG G5, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10e takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG G5, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos. Galaxy S10e counts with a little longer battery life than LG G5, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.