Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-07-02 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the LG G8S ThinQ, with a global score of 86.3 against 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a lighter phone than LG G8S ThinQ, but both are 0.31inches thick. The LG G8S ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S10e have very similar processors, they have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S10e has a bit better looking screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number per screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8S ThinQ has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3550mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S10e shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a camera with a 12 MP and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy S10e also has a bigger aperture for better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.