Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, getting an 86.3 score against 82.7. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the LG G8X ThinQ, even though they were released only a couple of months apart. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
LG G8X ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ's processor is very similar to Galaxy S10e's CPU, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e takes just a bit better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger diafragm aperture.
The LG G8X ThinQ features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G8X ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S10e, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG G8X ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.