Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than LG K52, with a score of 86.3 against 76. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10e is older than the LG K52, it's design is a bit thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a much greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S10e features a bit superior processor than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly better camera than LG K52, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a way better (4K) video definition.
LG K52 has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG K52 features longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.