Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is better than the LG K62's score of 78.2. The Galaxy S10e construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than LG K62, even though it was released a little bit over a year before. The Galaxy S10e features a little faster processor than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much better looking screen than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and much more pixels per inch of screen. LG K62 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10e features a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor providing a lot lower image quality and a back camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments and a lot better video quality.
The LG K62 has superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.