Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than LG Q70, with an 86.3 score against 77.9. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than the LG Q70, it's body is notably lighter and just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit superior processor than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixel density. LG Q70 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. LG Q70 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality images and videos, a smaller aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e costs more money than LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.