Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is slightly better than LG V10, having a overall score of 86.3 against 78.6. Galaxy S10e's body is extremely newer, extremely lighter and just a bit thinner than the LG V10. LG V10 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy S10e has a better performing processor than LG V10, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. LG V10 has a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity. The LG V10 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low light environments and a smaller sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG V10 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and faster 120 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than LG V10, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.