Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a general score of 86.3 against 81.3. Galaxy S10e's body is newer and just a little lighter than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is also just a little bit thicker. LG V35 ThinQ features a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in Samsung Galaxy S10e, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a just a little better display pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ features slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 6% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S10e, else you can save some money and get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.