Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 86.3 score against 81.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10e and the LG V40 ThinQ were released only 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is somewhat lighter but a little bit thicker than the LG V40 ThinQ. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display, a little bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10e, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Samsung Galaxy S10e, they have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a camera that is just as good as the Galaxy S10e one, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality pictures and videos, they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the same video definition, a F1.5 aperture and the same video frame rates.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.