Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S10e, having an 87.6 score against 86.3. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy S10e. The Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy S10e, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.