Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Galaxy S10e, having an 87.1 score against 86.3. LG Velvet's body has the same thickness than Galaxy S10e, but it's somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better hardware performance than LG Velvet. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The LG Velvet captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.