Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10e's global score of 86.3. Although LG Wing is newer than Samsung Galaxy S10e, it is much heavier and extremely thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG Wing, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S10e has a little bit better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen. The LG Wing shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the LG Wing also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
The LG Wing features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing features longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S10e. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S10e, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.