Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy S10e's score of 86.3. Motorola edge's body is newer than Galaxy S10e's, but it is thicker and much heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better looking display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola edge has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S10e, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10e has a little faster processing unit than Motorola edge. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola edge captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola edge also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
The Motorola edge counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs more than Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S10e. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S10e, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.