Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a overall score of 86.3 against 78.5. The Galaxy S10e is an extremely older and just a little thicker phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung managed to build it lighter anyway. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 42 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.