Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having an 86.3 score against 83.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy S10e has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S10e also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera and higher 120 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.