Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 general score. The Galaxy S10e is an incredibly older cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a much better 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S10e has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.