Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a global score of 86.3 against 83.4. The Galaxy S10e is an incredibly older device than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is notably lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 48% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.