Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 86.3. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is an notably older phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy S10e counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.