Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S10e's general score of 86.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy S10e's, although it's a little thicker and incredibly heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.