Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G, having an 86.3 score against 81.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than Moto G 5G, it's body is extremely lighter and extremely thinner. The Galaxy S10e has just a bit better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display. Galaxy S10e has a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a superior battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.