Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, having a general score of 86.3 against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S10e is an older phone than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, but it is somewhat thinner and way lighter anyway. The Galaxy S10e features a bit better performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S10e features just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.