Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting an 86.3 score against 76.1. The Galaxy S10e construction is a lot lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released around 13 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10e features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G Power has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S10e has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a way lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and video.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.