Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus (2021)'s global score of 79.3. Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Moto G Stylus (2021), although it was released around 23 months before. Galaxy S10e counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S10e features a slightly better display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. Moto G Stylus (2021) captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s storage for games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S10e one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
The Galaxy S10e costs more than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.