Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than Moto G200 5G, having a score of 86.3 against 86.2. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S10e is extremely older than Moto G200 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel count per display inch. The Moto G200 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a way tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S10e has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.