Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-12-20 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the Moto G51 5G, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 77.8. The Galaxy S10e design is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G51 5G has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G51 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also counts with higher 240 fps video frame rates and a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.