Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G60s's overall score of 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G60s. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density.
Moto G60s counts with a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G60s also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G60s has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent more battery size. The Moto G60s captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G60s also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.