Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Motorola Moto G71 5G, having a general score of 86.3 against 82.9. Although the Galaxy S10e is older than Motorola Moto G71 5G, it's design is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy S10e has a bit better screen than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G71 5G. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Moto G71 5G features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.