Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is better than the Moto G8 Plus's global score of 77.6. Although Galaxy S10e and Moto G8 Plus were only released 8 months apart, Galaxy S10e is much lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2280px, the Galaxy S10e also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. Moto G8 Plus shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G8 Plus also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.